Posts Tagged ‘Phil Jones’
About George Monbiot’s “Apology”
Anthony Watts (WattsUpWithThat) and Andrew Bolt (Herald Sun) are out with new posts and articles noting a so-called “apology” from George Monbiot, “one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming faith.” (Watts). What apology?!
About the Commented Code Released by the Alleged Hacker
Anthony Watts at WattsUpWithThat has a new post out showing comments in the code that was released by the alleged hacker last week. First, he says further review of the email shows that among the datasets Phil Jones used, some concluded that ‘global warming’ ended back in 1960 and that only with edited dated to “hide the decline” did Jones produce the current global warming trend. He shares that Jones now denies manipulating the data even if the email clearly state otherwise.
Anyway, Watts says that a review of the software code released by the alleged hacker includes comments clearly documenting data manipulation.
Swiftboating the Climate Scientists
George Marshall writes in the block Climate Change Denial a post bemoaning “Swiftboating the Climate Scientists.”
The theft of 1,000 private e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA) shows that deniers have learned lessons from dirty politics and are running a new campaign to undermine public trust in climate scientists. The feeble response from the UEA and the climate science community shows that scientists are still totally underestimating the fragility of that trust and the crucial role it plays in building public belief.
1,073 Email and 55MB of Files: The Fraud of Global Warming Exposed
Hackers recently seized and released 1,073 emails and 55MB of files from Climate Report and the University of East Anglia. Not unexpected on today’s Internet but the results are explosive. The content of the emails unequivocally show that global warming is a fraud and that scientists involved actively perpetrated this fraud.
Like so many others I have downloaded the hacked files and have begun perusing the emails. First, I’ve got to suspect the scientists involved feel very violated to find their emails now on the Internet for everyone to read. Interesting to note that they are admitted as genuine from several media reports (Phil Jones admits files taken, defends content; Gavin Schmidt says his are genuine). Second, they should be concerned about repercussions, whether they should have attorneys, and maybe whether it might be time to quietly retire. For Al Gore and others making a career out of global warning, this has to be a bone chilling moment as their entire religious crusade is exposed as fraud. What do they do? Admit it? Explain it away? Or, try to ignore it?
News
Climate Research Email Now Accessible Online Via Searchable Interface (An Elegant Chaos)
This Web site offers searchable link to the hacked email that appear to show the fraud of global warming advocates. (I set up my own searchable data set on my workstation but this is a sweet means for anyone to access the email via a simple query.)
News
When In Doubt, Delete (PowerLine)
Discusses example where “the global warming alarmists act like a gang of co-conspirators rather than respectable scientists.”
News
The Alarmists Do “Science”: A Case Study (PowerLine)
This detailed post concludes about the global warming conspirators exposed in the hacked Climate Research email: “The conclusion an observer is likely to draw from the CRU archive is that the climate alarmists are making up the science as they go along and are fitting facts to reach a predetermined conclusion rather than objectively seeking after truth. What they are doing is politics, not science.”
News
Global Warming Bombshell (PowerLine)
Offers early conclusion on the Climate Research data that the leading scientists promoting global warming are “engaged in politics, not science.” Further, “pro-global warming scientists fudge data to get the results they are looking for.”
News
Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’? (Telegraph)
“If the Hadley CRU scandal is true,it’s a blow to the AGW lobby’s credibility which is never likely to recover.”